http://fleshmilk21.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/25440263-wikipedia-review-evaluation-is-an-internet-forum-and-blog-site-for-the-discussion-of-wikimedia-structure-projects?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog is an Web forum and blog for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure projects, specifically the content and also problems of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Evaluation is a Wikipedia guard dog site, inspecting Wikipedia and also reporting on its defects. It supplies an independent discussion forum to go over Wikipedia editors and their impact on Wikipedia material. At its optimal, individuals included existing Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, individuals banned from Wikipedia, and also individuals that had never edited.The site was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and also organized by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it relocated to its own domain utilizing Invision Power Board software. The site called for enrollment making use of a legitimate e-mail address to upload and also blacklisted email suppliers that enabled privacy so as to dissuade the procedure of multiple accounts by a solitary individual.Wikipedia Testimonial was pointed out for its conversation of wiki-editing principles and its involvement in the analysis of the Palo Alto Research Firm's WikiDashboard.Discourse<img width="345" src="https://scontent.ftlv6-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/16938_275877016707_4880961_n.jpg">Wikipedia Review is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building workout, a role-playing game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not indicated as a source or training school for those that would infuse concern as well as torment in others. It does not exist to corrupt, yet to reveal corruption; it does not exist to take down institutions, yet to expose the ways in which establishments are taken down; it does not exist to despise, yet is indicated to expose hate in others. To expose these points is not bad. It is not a monolithic entity, nor the sum of its components. Like-mindedness does not suggest selfhood of objective; regard for the rights of one group does not suggest disrespect for the civil liberties of another. https://zenwriting.net/motherlegal30/important-recommendations-to-music-frequently-deprecating-performers-or is not intended to be foreseeable, regular, or boring.Picture a world in which people are not individual accounts, are not programmable, and are not plain words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...-- Declaration made when the website was out of solution in 2008, Wikipedia TestimonialSeth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Testimonial has actually given a prime focus for investigation right into Wikipedia-related issues such as the "Essjay dispute". Cade Metz, writing for The Register, attributed Wikipedia Review with the exploration of a exclusive subscriber list that brought about the resignation of a Wikipedia administrator; he additionally created that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" planned to outlaw the reference of Wikipedia Evaluation as well as similar websites on Wikipedia. The Independent kept in mind that " claims versus specific administrators came to a head on a site called Wikipedia Review, where individuals dispute the managers' activities." The Irish modern technology site Silicon Republic suggested seeing Wikipedia Review in order to " comply with disputes, discussions, editors as well as general administration on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens used posts made on Wikipedia Evaluation to aid create a report, published in Nexus Magazine, on WikiScanner and accusations that knowledge agencies had actually been utilizing Wikipedia to spread disinformation.Web content and frameworkWikipedia Evaluation's openly obtainable discussion forums are separated into four basic subject areas:Forum info;Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which includes subforums focusing on editors, the Wikipedia bureaucracy, meta discussion, short articles as well as general Wikimedia-focused subjects not fitting elsewhere;Media forums containing a information feed and conversation regarding information and also blogs featuring Wikipedia/Wikimedia; as well asOff subject, non-Wikimedia associated discussion. https://postheaven.net/candlebeef91/motion-picture-tv-as-well-as-video-clip-testimonials-structure

トップ   編集 凍結 差分 バックアップ 添付 複製 名前変更 リロード   新規 一覧 単語検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS
Last-modified: 2022-02-22 (火) 18:55:50 (802d)