aagaardhodge872585

https://bit.ly/3Br8uaV https://bit.ly/34Jxuye https://bit.ly/3HZrdg6 https://bit.ly/3oUTe0K https://bit.ly/3HXQEPh https://bit.ly/3BsU3CW https://bit.ly/3Bvk58A https://bit.ly/3sN6HsP https://bit.ly/3JBF10A

Dominant control over submissive mind is what I've always sought since I was about 12.

I will confess that I don't understand at all how that would be appealing or erotic or romantic. If it were possible, I would find it creepy. But it's not possible, so I suppose it can be a harmless fantasy. However, I get concerned when people imagine this fantasy is a reality. I get concerned both for them, because it sounds like maybe they should consult a psychologist; and I also get concerned for the rest of us, who are seeking truly consensual relationships. Because this ideology seems to blur the line between consensual and nonconsensual, and that could adversely effect us all.

For example, if a man is being prosecuted criminally for engaging in a consensual relationship, the court may not admit or consider as valid the testimony of his wife; especially if they feel her autonomy has been compromised and she has been mentally "controlled" in this way. I think it's to everyone's best interest to make it very clear that the people involved in Taken In Hand relationships are fully functioning adults, whose autonomy and free will are intact, and who are willingly *choosing* such relationships, not being mentally "controlled" and mentally "forced" into it.

Someone might object that the whole idea of "consensual nonconsent" also blurs the line between consent and nonconsent. But I would not agree with that, because the woman always retains her option to end the relationship. (In a Taken In Hand relationship.) Pretending that women don't really have that option because they're helpless victims is one of the more destructive politically correct ideologies running amok these days. In some abusive relationships, the poor woman may truly have lost all her options due to the very real threat of deadly violence. But more often that is not the case, because most men are not psychopathic killers, not even potentially. So I think they're is a lot of fantasy out there, regarding the victimization of women -- both by women who hate that idea, and also by women who find it appealing in some odd way. (Like, the masochistic slaves of the Gorean lifestyle.) But Taken In Hand is not about the woman's victimization at all; it's about her finding happiness and having her deepest romantic desires fulfilled.